Opinions and Analysis

Can SpaceX Turn Starlink into the Fourth Major Mobile Carrier in the United States?

The Verge examines SpaceX’s plan to use low-band spectrum and the Starlink satellite network to build a mobile communications business that competes with AT&T, Verizon, and T-Mobile. The discussion concludes that the project has clear differentiators, but requires massive investments, a terrestrial network, and roaming or wholesale agreements that have yet to be clarified.

2026-10-17
5 min read
3 views
certi.news
Can SpaceX Turn Starlink into the Fourth Major Mobile Carrier in the United States?

SpaceX is moving from its role as a satellite internet provider toward an attempt to build a large-scale mobile communications business in the United States, leveraging the Starlink satellite network and major acquisitions of low-band wireless spectrum. According to a discussion published by The Verge with Walter Piecyk, a partner and analyst at LightShed Partners, the company is not treating direct-to-phone connectivity through satellites merely as an additional service, but is approaching the construction of a mobile network that competes with AT&T, Verizon, and T-Mobile.

SpaceX recently agreed to purchase 800MHz spectrum for $8 billion, after spending approximately $20 billion on other spectrum from EchoStar the previous year. The U.S. Federal Communications Commission also approved the deployment of 15,000 additional next-generation satellites for Starlink. These steps provide a practical indication that the company is preparing to expand its business from satellite connectivity into a complementary terrestrial network.

Why Does Starlink Need a Terrestrial Network?

Satellites can provide coverage in remote areas, but they face limitations when a low-power phone connects from inside a building or in an area requiring high capacity. For this reason, Piecyk believes that low-band spectrum, which travels longer distances and penetrates buildings more effectively, is not merely a way to improve satellite performance, but a fundamental asset for building a terrestrial mobile network.

Advertisement

The spectrum SpaceX purchased belongs to bands previously associated with Nextel, and later became part of the regulatory arrangements accompanying the merger of Sprint and T-Mobile. EchoStar was supposed to use it to build a fourth competitor, but the company was unable to finance the acquisition and build the network on a nationwide scale. The article suggests that SpaceX could benefit from this legacy, including the possibility of purchasing existing radio equipment held by EchoStar if its bankruptcy proceedings allow it.

The Problem Is Not the Spectrum Alone

Even with the spectrum and satellites, SpaceX will need ground stations and antennas on communications towers. The analysis suggests that small cells connected to Starlink dishes could be part of the solution, but they would not eliminate the need for large towers providing the necessary coverage, capacity, and penetration. The company may be able to lease sites from tower companies such as American Tower rather than building the entire infrastructure from scratch.

The article estimates that an initial build providing usable coverage could require approximately $10 billion to $15 billion in capital expenditures, in addition to between $10 billion and $30 billion to purchase spectrum. These are preliminary estimates for building a market entry, not the cost of creating a complete competitive nationwide network. SpaceX would also need roaming or wholesale agreements with other operators, which could be costly, while AT&T, Verizon, and T-Mobile do not appear eager to facilitate the entry of a new competitor.

What Could Differentiate the Project?

The clearest advantage is coverage in areas where installing new towers is difficult, along with the possibility of providing direct-to-phone connectivity that goes beyond the limited text messaging offered by some current satellite services. The same infrastructure could open opportunities for the Internet of Things and other data services, as well as the use of satellite connectivity in cars, robots, and potential SpaceX products.

But these advantages do not settle the question of performance. Users want fast, reliable service and adequate battery life, including inside buildings and in crowded areas. SpaceX will have to prove that integrated satellite and terrestrial connectivity can provide this experience at a competitive cost, rather than merely offering emergency coverage or connectivity in remote areas.

What Changes in Practice?

If SpaceX succeeds in attracting its first five or ten million subscribers, it could gain a revenue base that justifies additional investments and gives it greater leverage in negotiations over roaming and spectrum. But this scenario depends on the company’s ability to manage a large consumer business, including device sales, customer service, marketing, support, and financing—areas that differ from launching rockets or operating a satellite internet service.

The relationship with T-Mobile remains an unresolved factor. The two companies began a partnership for direct-to-device connectivity, but the article points to increasing tension and changing positions among management. Major operators are also developing their own satellite responses, which could turn the competition into a race between hybrid networks rather than an immediate replacement of traditional operators.

Editorial reading: The actual change is not the announcement of a new satellite service, but SpaceX’s move toward owning elements of a terrestrial mobile network: low-band spectrum, towers and radio stations, and a potential customer base. The significance of the move is that it opens a new competitive front against U.S. telecommunications companies, but the constraints are clear: the cost of construction, capacity, potential reliance on roaming, and customer-service expertise. The source therefore does not establish that SpaceX will immediately become a nationwide alternative, but it does establish that the company has begun assembling the assets needed for a long and costly attempt.

News source
c
Author

certi.news

What you need to know

SpaceX is considering transforming Starlink from a satellite internet service into a U.S. mobile communications network combining satellites and terrestrial infrastructure. The company owns some of the necessary assets, but entering as a national competitor would require massive investments, cell towers and ground stations, as well as roaming or wholesale agreements that have not yet been finalized.

  • SpaceX agreed to purchase wireless spectrum in the 800 MHz band for $8 billion, after spending about $20 billion on spectrum from EchoStar.
  • The U.S. Federal Communications Commission approved the deployment of 15,000 additional next-generation satellites for Starlink.
  • The project requires a terrestrial network including stations and antennas on telecommunications towers, because satellites alone cannot provide sufficient capacity and indoor penetration in dense areas.
  • The article estimates initial capital spending of about $10 billion to $15 billion for usable coverage, in addition to $10 billion to $30 billion for spectrum purchases.
  • SpaceX will likely need roaming or wholesale agreements with other operators, while AT&T, Verizon and T-Mobile do not appear eager to facilitate the entry of a new competitor.
  • The analysis does not establish that SpaceX will immediately become a nationwide alternative; rather, it points to the company’s readiness for a long and costly attempt to build a hybrid network.

FAQ

Why does Starlink need a terrestrial network?

Because satellites face limitations when connecting to low-power phones inside buildings or in areas with high demand, while low-band spectrum and terrestrial towers help improve coverage, capacity and penetration.

How much investment is expected to build the network?

The article estimates initial spending of about $10 billion to $15 billion to provide usable coverage, in addition to $10 billion to $30 billion for spectrum purchases.

Will SpaceX immediately replace traditional operators?

No. The analysis explains that the project faces challenges involving capacity, performance, cost and customer service, and that its success as a national competitor remains uncertain.

What is the status of SpaceX’s partnership with T-Mobile?

The companies began a partnership for direct-to-device connectivity, but the article points to growing tension and shifts in management positions, so the relationship remains an unresolved factor.

In the same category

You may also like

View all news