Artificial intelligence

Meta Launches Muse Spark Open Model with 816 Billion Parameters That Runs Locally on Two Mac Studio Devices

Meta has launched the open-weight Muse Spark Open artificial intelligence model, designed for coding and long-running agentic tasks, which can run locally on two Mac Studio devices equipped with M5 Ultra processors and a combined 1 terabyte of unified memory. Although its weights are available for download, the model is subject to Meta’s license, which imposes commercial restrictions on certain uses.

2026-10-16
4 min read
45 views
certi.news
Meta Launches Muse Spark Open Model with 816 Billion Parameters That Runs Locally on Two Mac Studio Devices

Meta has announced the Muse Spark Open model, an open-weight artificial intelligence model with 816 billion parameters that can run entirely locally on two Mac Studio devices equipped with M5 Ultra processors. The model focuses on software development, long-running agentic tasks, and multistep reasoning.

The model uses a mixture-of-experts architecture, activating 42 billion parameters per token, with a context window extending to 1 million tokens. It also supports text, image, video, and audio inputs, enabling its use in tasks that go beyond text generation and conventional coding.

Local Operation Requires Unusual Hardware

Meta developed the model in cooperation with Apple, and it was optimized to run through the MLX machine-learning framework on Mac Studio devices equipped with M5 Ultra processors. The reference configuration uses two devices, each containing 512 gigabytes of unified memory, providing 1 terabyte in total that can accommodate the entire model.

Advertisement

This configuration benefits from the graphics processing unit’s access to the system’s unified memory, as well as the M5 Ultra processor’s memory bandwidth of 1.2 terabytes per second. Meta describes the two devices as operating like a single desktop supercomputer, but these are not typical configurations for users; the Mac Studio version with 512 gigabytes of memory was not available for sale when the article was published, and was expected to launch in late October.

What Does the Model Change for Developers?

Meta tested Muse Spark Open with Muse Code in scenarios based on coding agents. In one demonstration, the model used the Ice Cubes project, an open-source client for Mastodon, to fix bugs and add features. In another demonstration, it controlled DaVinci Resolve, examined video frame by frame, then identified clips suitable for the vertical format and cropped them.

These examples indicate that the model’s focus is not limited to answering questions, but extends to carrying out sequences of actions across multiple tools and programs. The model scored 89.2 points on the MCP-Atlas test and 61.8 points on JobBench, according to the evaluations published by Meta.

Broad Support and a License That Is Not Fully Open Source

Muse Spark Open supports the SGLang, vLLM, TensorRT-LLM, Hugging Face Transformers, llama.cpp, Unsloth, and MLX inference frameworks, and can run on AMD, Apple, Intel, and NVIDIA hardware. Its weights are also available through Hugging Face, Amazon SageMaker AI, Google Cloud Model Garden, and Microsoft Foundry Models, while Baseten, Fireworks AI, Groq, Modal, Nebius, OpenRouter, and Together AI provide access through application programming interfaces.

Nevertheless, describing the model as open weight does not mean that it is fully open source. Meta released it under the Muse Model License, which imposes certain commercial restrictions, particularly on high-revenue companies that offer it as a service. At the same time, the license allows free use in a number of commercial scenarios, such as internal use and integration into other products.

Limits of the Superiority Claim

Meta presents the model as the most capable among open-weight models developed in the United States, not among all open models worldwide. The comparisons cited in the article show that GLM 5.3, Kimi K3, and some Qwen models outperform it in certain coding and general-performance tests. Therefore, the practical value of Muse Spark Open is tied to its ability to run locally, its multimodal architecture, and its support for agentic tasks, rather than to a claim of comprehensive superiority over all competitors.

News source
c
Author

certi.news

What you need to know

Meta has released the open-weight Muse Spark Open model, which includes 816 billion parameters and can run locally on two Mac Studio computers with M5 Ultra processors and a combined 1 terabyte of unified memory. The model focuses on programming and multistep agentic tasks, but its license imposes certain commercial restrictions and does not make it fully open source.

  • Muse Spark Open supports text, images, video, and audio. It uses a mixture-of-experts architecture, activating 42 billion parameters per token, with a context window of 1 million tokens.
  • The reference local setup requires two Mac Studio computers, each containing 512 gigabytes of unified memory.
  • Meta developed the model in collaboration with Apple and optimized it to run on the MLX architecture.
  • Meta tested the model with Muse Code for software-engineering tasks and with DaVinci Resolve for video analysis and editing.
  • The model weights are available through platforms such as Hugging Face, Amazon SageMaker AI, Google Cloud Model Garden, and Microsoft Foundry Models. Several companies also provide access through APIs.
  • The Muse Model License imposes certain commercial restrictions, although it permits some free commercial uses, such as internal use and integration into other products.

FAQ

What is Muse Spark Open?

It is an open-weight AI model from Meta with 816 billion parameters, designed for programming, long-horizon agentic tasks, and multistep reasoning.

What hardware is required to run it locally?

The article specifies a setup of two Mac Studio computers with M5 Ultra processors, each with 512 gigabytes of unified memory, for a total of 1 terabyte.

Is Muse Spark Open fully open source?

No. The weights are available, but the model is subject to the Muse Model License, which imposes certain commercial restrictions.

Does the model outperform all open models?

The article does not support that conclusion; it indicates that GLM 5.3, Kimi K3, and some Qwen models outperform it on certain tests.

In the same category

You may also like

View all news